This is the ultimate in nerdery. Thanks to Absolutely No Machete Juggling
Next time you want to introduce someone to Star Wars for the first time, watch the films with them in this order: IV, V, II, III, VI
Notice something? Yeah, Episode I is gone.
I think that it totally makes sense. I don’t have any real issue with Episode I and in fact, took my kids to see it in 3D a couple weeks ago.- but I have to agree that this order would make for a more interesting story Arc.
So, I’ve put up with the changes to the iPad’s music app since iOS5 was released without complaining, but I just have to say something.
Crap. That is what I think about it. The interface is terrible- the buttons are in the wrong spots from an ergonomic perspective and features are just flat-out missing. There is no consistency in the UI and the shading used to indicate the status on buttons is just terrible. When you choose to listen to an Artist, the option at the top of the list that used to say “all Songs” is just gone. In other words, the only way to listen to all songs by an artist- which I used to do fairly often- is to create a playlist. Lame.
Perhaps the most frustrating thing is that the music app works great on the iPhone. Reason? They didn’t change it.
So, I previously said that I wasn’t having a lot of problems with Google and all of their controversy, but this one kind of pushes me further towards finding replacements for Google services.
There is a really good overview of the current story on Daring Fireball and John’s article is what got me thinking about it.
Basically, here is the rundown-
Google has been using a method of acquiring data about users that you have the ability to block in certain browsers, Safari being one of them. Since a fairly large portion of searches and web browsing activity takes place on iOS devices like the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch, this creates a problem for Google.
Here is some background- I tried to make it very layman friendly and it is not totally accurate from a technical view in order to keep it simple.
Whenever you go to a site, the folks running that site have the ability to leave behind little bits of code called Cookies, that then send data back and can indicate what you are looking at, and can remember you for future return visits. This can be a good thing as you may not have to login the next time you return and it may remember your preferences. These are called 1st party Cookies.
There is also a different, but related way of using cookies and they are called 3rd party cookies. In essence, you go to a site like before and cookies are left behind, but the cookies don’t have the same basic domain name and report your activity even after you leave the site that you originally visited. Here is a little example from Wikipedia:
For example: Suppose a user visits
www.example1.com, which sets a cookie with the domainad.foxytracking.com. When the user later visitswww.example2.com, another cookie is set with the domainad.foxytracking.com. Eventually, both of these cookies will be sent to the advertiser when loading their ads or visiting their website. The advertiser can then use these cookies to build up a browsing history of the user across all the websites this advertiser has footprints on.
As I mentioned above, most all browsers give you the ability to block 3rd party cookies. Some, like Safari- both the desktop and mobile versions, have 3rd party cookies turned off by default.
Essentially, what came out in the last week is that Google had figured a way around the “block 3rd party cookies” option. In other words, they were installing 3rd party cookie contrary to the settings of the browser.
Now, most people don’t ever go into the settings area and change anything, so you can’t just assume that everyone with 3rd party cookies blocked, necessarily made that choice consciously.
In essence, Google has made a decision that their revenue model and the user data from 3rd party cookies that they depend on to support it, is more important than the wishes of users.
I don’t know how you feel about this, but I don’t like it. I’m totally ok with 1st party cookies, but this just feels sneaky and dishonest.
Here’s a post on iMore, which used to be The iPhone Blog (TIPB) claiming that Apple is getting ready to switch to a smaller connector/charging port in order to make more room for bigger batteries and newer batteries- most likely 4G LTE.
I am really not a fan of the dock connector and welcome this change. There is no technical reason that it needs to be as big as it is currently.
I say that the death of Flash can’t come too soon.
With the growth of mobile units in the hand of consumers and the massive growth in web traffic originating from mobile devices, it is imperative that we begin to leave Flash behind. This announcement couldn’t have come too soon.
If Flash were rolled out as a new technology today, it would be found completely inadequate.
Michael Hyatt puts it like this-
It quickly became apparent that he didn’t want to change. In fact, the entire conversation was about why he couldn’t change, why he didn’t need to change, and why he wasn’t responsible for the results he was getting.
Ten minutes into the discussion, I realized I was dealing with a fool. There was no point in continuing the conversation. More talk would not change anything.
I’ve certainly believed that I knew the difference between wise men and fools, but I’ve never heard it put so clearly before. This is one to add to my daily self check list.
Michael is great and I’d suggest you add him to your daily reading.
